Historical Issues - Revision history

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 14 November 2005
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==[[Hawai'i Statehood Day 2005]]==		==[[Hawai'i Statehood Day 2005]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi5/bigfiles3/statehoodday2005.html~~
−
	Hawaii Statehood Day 2005 -- No Celebration on Any Island, But An Anti-Statehood Attempted Rally on Maui		Hawaii Statehood Day 2005 -- No Celebration on Any Island, But An Anti-Statehood Attempted Rally on Maui

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 14 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	=Overthrow, Annexation, Indigenous Status, Etc.=	+	Overthrow, Annexation, Indigenous Status, Etc.
		+
	(c) Copyright 2000 - 2005 Kenneth R. Conklin, Ph.D. All rights reserved		(c) Copyright 2000 - 2005 Kenneth R. Conklin, Ph.D. All rights reserved

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 13 November 2005
Line 110:		Line 110:

	==[[Aren't we all sovereign now?]]==		==[[Aren't we all sovereign now?]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/hanifinallsovereign.html~~
−
	Aren't we all sovereign now? (an informal essay by attorney Patrick Hanifin)		Aren't we all sovereign now? (an informal essay by attorney Patrick Hanifin)

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 What kind of sovereignty might be historically and morally justifiable, as well as politically possible?
-==[[A Brief History of Citizenship and Voting Rights in Hawai'i]]== Hawai'ihttp://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/HanifinCitizen.html
+==[[A Brief History of Citizenship and Voting Rights in Hawai'i]]==
 A Brief History of Citizenship and Voting Rights in Hawai'i (Kingdom, Republic, Territory, and State) by attorney Patrick W. Hanifin.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 13 November 2005
Line 81:		Line 81:

	==[[Are kanaka maoli entitled to reparations?]]==		==[[Are kanaka maoli entitled to reparations?]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/hanifinreparations.html~~
−
	(a lengthy legal argument by attorney Patrick Hanifin)		(a lengthy legal argument by attorney Patrick Hanifin)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 13 November 2005
Line 86:		Line 86:

	==[[Does the U.S. Owe Hawaiians Anything?]]==		==[[Does the U.S. Owe Hawaiians Anything?]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/whatusoweshawaiians.html~~

	==[[What kind of sovereignty?]]==		==[[What kind of sovereignty?]]==

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, 13 November 2005
Line 78:		Line 78:

	==[[Were the lands stolen?]]==		==[[Were the lands stolen?]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/stolenlands.html~~
−
	Do the ceded lands rightfully belong to kanaka maoli alone?		Do the ceded lands rightfully belong to kanaka maoli alone?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:38, 13 November 2005
Line 76:		Line 76:

	==[[Did kanaka maoli exercise self-determination?]]==		==[[Did kanaka maoli exercise self-determination?]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/selfdetermination.html~~

	==[[Were the lands stolen?]]==		==[[Were the lands stolen?]]==

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 13 November 2005
Line 188:		Line 188:

	==[[Analogy of the Stolen House]]==		==[[Analogy of the Stolen House]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/stolenhousecar.html~~
−
	Analogy of the Stolen House and its mutation, Analogy of the Stolen Car. Around the turn of the century (2000, not 1900!) an analogy became popular among some Hawaiian sovereignty activists. They said Hawaiian history was like the history of a house that got overwhelmed by guests. A few guests were welcomed but then moved in permanently. The guests then invited more guests of their own. All the guests then began making new house rules. Soon the original (and still rightful) homeowners were forced to live in a small rear bedroom, and perhaps even forced to live in a tent in the backyard. The original homeowners finally got angry and are trying to reassert their rights. They might even call the cops to help them take back what is rightfully theirs.		Analogy of the Stolen House and its mutation, Analogy of the Stolen Car. Around the turn of the century (2000, not 1900!) an analogy became popular among some Hawaiian sovereignty activists. They said Hawaiian history was like the history of a house that got overwhelmed by guests. A few guests were welcomed but then moved in permanently. The guests then invited more guests of their own. All the guests then began making new house rules. Soon the original (and still rightful) homeowners were forced to live in a small rear bedroom, and perhaps even forced to live in a tent in the backyard. The original homeowners finally got angry and are trying to reassert their rights. They might even call the cops to help them take back what is rightfully theirs.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 8 November 2005
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==[[Hawai'i's Great Statehood Petition]]==		==[[Hawai'i's Great Statehood Petition]]==
−	~~http://www.angelfire.com/hi2/hawaiiansovereignty/statehoodpetition1954.html~~
−
	Hawai’i’s Great Statehood Petition of February 1954 had 120,000 signatures gathered in 2 weeks on a petition for statehood for Hawai'i. A huge roll of newsprint was unrolled for a block in downtown Honolulu for people to sign the petition. Two weeks later a sendoff celebration was held at ‘Iolani Palace including chants, hula, kahili, and torch bearers before sending the 250 pound petition to Congress. Quotes are provided from 1954 newspaper articles, and photo captions, describing the events of those two weeks. Information is provided about what has happened to the petition and where it is stored today. The contents of one signature page are provided including 32 names and addresses.		Hawai’i’s Great Statehood Petition of February 1954 had 120,000 signatures gathered in 2 weeks on a petition for statehood for Hawai'i. A huge roll of newsprint was unrolled for a block in downtown Honolulu for people to sign the petition. Two weeks later a sendoff celebration was held at ‘Iolani Palace including chants, hula, kahili, and torch bearers before sending the 250 pound petition to Congress. Quotes are provided from 1954 newspaper articles, and photo captions, describing the events of those two weeks. Information is provided about what has happened to the petition and where it is stored today. The contents of one signature page are provided including 32 names and addresses.